________________________________________________________________________
ICP-2 principles questionnaire report and data published
________________________________________________________________________
The NRO NC — which also acts as the ASO AC — has completed its
qualitative analysis and summary of the community responses received to
the questionnaire on the proposed principles to update ICP-2. The
questionnaire was open from 8 October until 6 December 2024. During this
window, 298 individual submissions were received from the Regional
Internet Registry (RIR) communities. The summary and the raw data
questionnaire are available here.
https://www.nro.net/policy/internet-coordination-policy-2/icp-2-principles-questionnaire-report-and-data/
This summary provides an overview of the input received, first and
foremost, to support the drafting of the updated ICP-2 document, and
secondly, to report back to the RIR communities. Thirdly, the feedback
provides important insights that will be valuable for the future
implementation of the updated version of ICP-2.
https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/ICP-2-Questionnaire-Summary-Report.pdf
The summary does not include the NRO NC’s opinions on or responses to
the comments submitted, nor does it include an evaluation of the
communities’ opinion on the principles. The NRO NC will continue to
discuss the communities’ feedback as well as the input received
through ICANN’s Public Comment while drafting the updated ICP-2
document.
https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-internet-coordination-policy-2-icp-2-version-2-principles-08-10-2024
For each proposed principle, respondents could express their level of
agreement through a five-point opinion scale (Strongly Agree, Agree,
Neutral, Disagree, or Strongly Disagree) and provide comments.
Additionally, they could share general feedback at the end of the
questionnaire.
It was noted in reviewing the responses that approximately half were
found to be duplicate comments. The duplicate responses were
consolidated and considered as a single input. It is important to note
that these near-identical responses have also been included in this
analysis. The NRO NC has provided more details on how these responses
were identified and treated in the Methodology section of the summary
and the PDF containing the text of the comments.
Further, many responses provided a rating that did not match the content
of the response. In these cases, the NRO NC prioritized the content of
the response, rather than using the rating. For the purposes of
transparency, the full datasets with the duplicate responses, as well as
a filtered dataset without duplicate answers are available in both PDF
and CSV formats. The NRO NC encourages you to browse through the actual
data along with reading the summary.
The NRO NC sincerely thanks everyone who has shared their insights. It
was a long questionnaire, and the time, thought and effort put in by the
respondents is greatly appreciated.
Sent on behalf of the NRO NC / ASO AC
________________________________________________________________________
APNIC Secretariat
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Tel: +61 7 3858 3100
https://www.apnic.net
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Go to the APNIC-announce mailing list on Orbit --
https://orbit.apnic.net/mailing-list/[email protected]
Explore https://orbit.apnic.net, where the APNIC community connect, discuss and
share information related to Internet addressing and networking.
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
APNIC-talk - https://mailman.apnic.net/[email protected]/
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
