> Excellent comments, good descriptions, but I'm concerned/surprised > about a /usr/local/bin/ profile -- seems to somewhat violate the > idea that /usr/local is for admins.
Ah, sorry, I did mean to mention that. The Debian/Ubuntu packages that Boundary provide unfortunately install bprobe into /usr/local/bin. I've suggested to them that they either use /usr/sbin or /opt, but I don't think fixing it (and/or FHS and Debian/Ubuntu policy) is high on their list of concerns right now. If the consensus is that the profile should have a sane name regardless of the current state of the packages, I'm happy to fix up my branch. -- https://code.launchpad.net/~elmo/apparmor-profiles/bprobe/+merge/127090 Your team AppArmor Developers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~elmo/apparmor-profiles/bprobe into lp:apparmor-profiles. -- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
