On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 01:58:49PM -0700, John Johansen wrote: > On 10/12/2012 01:36 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > > How about using getpagesize() instead? > > > We certainly could, but certainly isn't required for this test. > > tbh I am not even sure why we are bothering with PAGE_SIZE at > all, after all we are just allocating some space for the threads > stack. And for this case anything over a few hundred bytes should > be sufficient.
I suspect (since my recollection of writing this testcase is lost in the sands of time) that I was just trying to be conservative in allocating a sufficiently sized stack for the child thread. I'm not opposed to doing something differently here. -- Steve Beattie <[email protected]> http://NxNW.org/~steve/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
