On 05/09/2013 10:55 AM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:58:40AM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
>>>> -static struct aa_fs_entry aa_fs_entry =
>>>> - AA_FS_DIR("apparmor", aa_fs_entry_apparmor);
>>>> +static struct aa_fs_entry aa_fs_entry[] = {
>>>> + AA_FS_DIR("apparmor", aa_fs_entry_apparmor),
>>>> + { }
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> I didn't see the reasoning behind this change.. nothing really wrong
>>> with it, but it appeared to just complicate nearly every line of code
>>> that touched aa_fs_entry, except one..
>>>
>> the { } entry is needed otherwise we can walk off the end of the array in
>> some of the loop code. ie its a necessary terminator
>
> Except I haven't spotted the iteration over the one-element-array yet.. :)
>
Hrmmm, true enough we only iterate over its children files
--
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
