On 06/05/2013 10:43 AM, Kshitij Gupta wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> @Christian First off, what mail client do you use? I'd like to be able to 
> have my replies like you all do.
> 
> Back to topic at hand, the config wrapper has two additional functions 
> besides the read and write (which also sets the permissions for the 
> profiles). So, for the time being I'll keep redo the config file with the 
> configprofiler module and if later on I can rather easily do-away with the 
> config library file if its not needed (though I'll note down this point 
> because I might forget it later on).
> 
thats fine

> Okay, I'll go through the roadmap once again and then setup the wikipage for 
> my roadmap. (Any naming ideas for the wikipage?) Also, a new name for the 
> library tools package (If we're moving away from Immunix)? ;-)
> 
GSoC2013 would work, so would ProfileDevelopmentTool, or Genprofv2, or ...

tool library naming I would use either apparmor or the toolname as part of the 
library name

libapparmorutils.py or libgenprof.py, or apparmorutils_lib.py, genprof_lib.py, 
... something along those lines


> As, for the code review John went into the docstrings and comments which I 
> quite agree too, since Python code in general is pretty readable in general 
> so a few explanatory comments should be sufficient. But I suppose a few lines 
> of docstring will not harm (and will be useful when importing the modules, 
> since AppArmor.py will be pretty long). Also, I agree with John whatever 
> seems more "obvious/Pythonic way" to do it should be adopted. Apart from the 
> commenting, I'll take that the coding style for those few lines was okay to 
> everyone?  ;-)
> 
Writing docstrings is a good habit to get into in case you ever find yourself 
in a situation where you will need them, but like I said for this/opensource in 
general use your judgment.

I didn't have any issues with the code I reviewed beyond what I already 
commented one.

> I think I love the blogpost about the weekly progress idea, so hopefully I'll 
> try to follow that (Does anyone want me to setup a new blog for the 
> sole-purpose?).
> 
apparmor doesn't have a blog setup atm, we could look into setting one up. Suse 
might have a blog that can be used by their GSoC projects we will have to check 
into it.

> Looks good enough to me, I'll setup my IRC client for that. We have a variety 
> of timezones (mine being UTC+5:30), though gladly I don't quite have issues 
> with time since, I spend much of my day (and night) near my computer. :-D
> 
> You and John can decide on the schedule for weekly meetings, I'll let you 
> know if the schedule does not suit me (that'd be highly unlikely though).
> 
I would guess during cboltz's evening will work best  17:00 UTC to 23:00 UTC, 
and probably during the week as real life seams to affect weekend schedules more

> I'll try to be present in the next meeting. BTW, anything on the agenda 
> requiring my presence?
> 
required? no, you have already introduced yourself and the meeting will likely 
be the same set of people
nice to have, sure

I am guessing since you are UTC+5:30 that the meeting is getting pretty late 
for you. Would an earlier time be better? Perhaps 17:00 or 18:00 UTC?


-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to