On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:24:03PM -0700, John Johansen wrote: > On 06/23/2013 07:07 AM, Kshitij Gupta wrote: > > There are few useful functions present in the native C code like the > > parsers, which are also needed at other places like profile tools. > > > > It maybe a good idea to actually have the code available as a library > > to avoid re-writing everything from scratch and also reducing > > redundancy. > > > As discussed in IRC, so we don't loose the reply > > This highly desired, and on the roadmap, but there is a lot of work to be > done before this can happen.
While making the parser a library call is a bit of work and not an immediate priority at the moment, are there other bits of native C code that would be useful to you, Kshitij? Depending on the difficulty of doing so, we can either work toward enabling them or put them on the roadmap so as not to be forgotten. In addition, for those items that cannot be immediately pulled out into a C library function and wrapped for other languages, please try to structure things in such a way that the any rewritten implementations that are done because the C versions aren't available are isolated so that when we do export them, we can drop the call to the C library into place with relative ease. -- Steve Beattie <[email protected]> http://NxNW.org/~steve/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
