On 07/05/2013 07:17 PM, Seth Arnold wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 05:15:07PM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> 
>> @@ -428,6 +546,7 @@
>>          s = "%s# No read paths specified" % prefix
>>          if len(read_path) > 0:
>>              s = "%s# Specified read permissions" % (prefix)
>> +            read_path.sort()
>>              for i in read_path:
>>                  for r in self.gen_path_rule(i, 'r'):
>>                      s += "\n%s%s" % (prefix, r)
>> @@ -438,17 +557,109 @@
>>          s = "%s# No write paths specified" % prefix
>>          if len(write_path) > 0:
>>              s = "%s# Specified write permissions" % (prefix)
>> +            write_path.sort()
>>              for i in write_path:
>>                  for r in self.gen_path_rule(i, 'rwk'):
>>                      s += "\n%s%s" % (prefix, r)
>>          policy = re.sub(r' *%s' % search, s, policy)
> 
> We may also need a way to allow profile authors to push 'k' through on
> files that they'll only read. (Maybe all these cases will already be
> handled via abstractions.)
> 

Agreed. Fixed.


-- 
Jamie Strandboge                 http://www.ubuntu.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to