On 07/08/2013 09:38 AM, John Johansen wrote: > On 07/08/2013 07:15 AM, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >> On 07/08/2013 04:06 AM, John Johansen wrote: >>> Below is a mostly complete patch for >>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/888077 >>> >>> It is currently missing support for link and mount rules. This patch is >>> done against the 2.8 branch, and the question is, is this something we >>> want in 2.8.2/3. It is rather large, and I want to rework it some before >>> it goes to the 2.9/3.0 branch. So the two branch will differ on this >>> point if we pull it into 2.8 >>> >> >> IMHO, we should focus on the patch for 2.9/3.0. 2.8.2 is about to release and >> this does seem big. Once the patch is finalized there, we can consider >> backporting for 2.8.3. This should help keep us from iterating on two >> different >> branches and save time. > > The 2.9/3.0 version of this will never be backported 2.8.x > > Perhaps I wasn't clear enough when I said I want to rework some things. I want > to make it dependent on other changes I have planned for 2.9/3.0 which means > a much larger multi-patch backport for 2.8 >
Does it need the link and mount rules for inclusion in 2.8? If so, I still suggest waiting or just saying it is for 2.9/3.0. -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
