On 07/27/2013 10:02 AM, Christian Boltz wrote: > Hello, > > see the attached file for r26 and r27 review notes. > > @John: I'm still waiting for your answer about > # ix implies m, so we don't need to add m if ix is present > so ignore this, as we are not doing this
> I have some profiles that contain "mrix" (for example sbin.dhclient and > usr.sbin.ntpd), so either the old logprof was buggy or the comment is > wrong ;-) > neither, it was actually a change in kernel behavior that affected policy. It used to be that m was not needed for ix because of where the tests where done. A change in that behavior happened 5 or 6 years ago. so at best the comment should have been changed as this rolled through -- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
