On 2013-12-09 13:16:37, Steve Beattie wrote: > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 11:49:56AM -0800, John Johansen wrote: > > On 12/06/2013 11:22 AM, Seth Arnold wrote: > I'd like to have the group's consensus that changes made via launchpad > should be treated as a patch submission, and that a reviewer with > commit access should be able to merge these changes to trunk, without > needing to go to the list (obviously, the list is available should > specific questions arise). And of course, it would be on the person > doing the merge to review the changes to confirm that they're sane, > to the extant possible without having knowledge of the languages > in question. > > I ask, because translations people have made fixes and I would like > to get them incorporated into trunk, and so I want to move on getting > the two trees in sync. > > Are people okay with this? Is there another way we should handle this?
This is fine with me. If there are changes to a language that someone in apparmor-dev speaks, then they should handle the merge. For other languages, I think the merger's review is sufficient. Tyler
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
