I haven't had a chance to review the userspace IPC patches, but now I see that JJ has patch mount.sh quite a bit patch 21. To make sure that I don't get in the way of that patch set landing, I'm going to rebase this set on top of the IPC patch set. So, ignore these patches for now.
Tyler On 2014-03-24 14:19:13, Tyler Hicks wrote: > The first test number was missing the "A" prefix and the last test > number was not incremented. > > This is nearly useless patch allows me to explain the following > mount.sh fix a little more clearly. > > Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <[email protected]> > --- > tests/regression/apparmor/mount.sh | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tests/regression/apparmor/mount.sh > b/tests/regression/apparmor/mount.sh > index 5cfa3fe..984b26b 100755 > --- a/tests/regression/apparmor/mount.sh > +++ b/tests/regression/apparmor/mount.sh > @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ then > fatalerror 'Unable to find a free loop device' > fi > > -# TEST 1. Make sure can mount and umount unconfined > +# TEST A1. Make sure can mount and umount unconfined > > runchecktest "MOUNT (unconfined)" pass mount ${loop_device} ${mount_point} > runchecktest "UMOUNT (unconfined)" pass umount ${loop_device} ${mount_point} > @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ runchecktest "MOUNT (confined)" fail mount ${loop_device} > ${mount_point} > genprofile > runchecktest "UMOUNT (confined)" fail umount ${loop_device} ${mount_point} > > -# TEST A4. confine UMOUNT - cap sys_admin allows unmount > +# TEST A5. confine UMOUNT - cap sys_admin allows unmount > genprofile capability:sys_admin > runchecktest "UMOUNT (confined)" pass umount ${loop_device} ${mount_point} > > -- > 1.9.1 > > > -- > AppArmor mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
