On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 03:31:38PM -0700, Steve Beattie wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 04:29:11PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > This will simplify add new features as most of the code can reside in
> > its own class. There are still things to improve but its a start.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: John Johansen <[email protected]>
> 
> I've not reviewed this patch much at all, but after applying it,
> valgrind is offering complaints like the following when dealing with
> profiles with mount rules:
> 
>   ==27919== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
>   ==27919==    at 0x805CDC1: mnt_rule::mnt_rule(cond_entry*, char*, 
> cond_entry*, char*, int) (mount.c:436)
>   ==27919==    by 0x805674E: do_mnt_rule(cond_entry*, char*, cond_entry*, 
> char*, int) (parser_yacc.y:1389)
>   ==27919==    by 0x8057937: yyparse() (parser_yacc.y:1133)
>   ==27919==    by 0x8053916: process_profile(int, char const*) 
> (parser_main.c:1003)
>   ==27919==    by 0x804B20E: main (parser_main.c:1340)
> 
> I believe something like the following patch is needed:

Doing this consistently with the other initializers for the mount
class instead:

Signed-off-by: Steve Beattie <[email protected]>

Index: apparmor/parser/mount.c
===================================================================
--- apparmor.orig/parser/mount.c        2014-03-24 15:24:19.000000000 -0700
+++ apparmor/parser/mount.c     2014-03-24 16:05:06.227815297 -0700
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@
                   struct cond_entry *dst_conds __unused, char *mnt_point_p,
                   int allow_p):
        mnt_point(mnt_point_p), device(device_p), trans(NULL), opts(NULL),
-       audit(0), deny(0)
+       flags(0), inv_flags(0), audit(0), deny(0)
 {
        /* FIXME: dst_conds are ignored atm */
        aa_class = AA_CLASS_MOUNT;


-- 
Steve Beattie
<[email protected]>
http://NxNW.org/~steve/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to