On 09/22/2014 11:51 PM, intrigeri wrote: > > * We can try to convince Canonical's management to prioritize > upstreaming AppArmor kernel patches higher. We didn't really come > up with a clear decision or way to go about it, but it would be > good to see this happen somehow. > This isn't so much convincing it is important-- it was time. This is already starting based on this weeks Ubuntu Security team meeting:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs/Security/20140922 ... > * Regarding the policy: we agreed that on the long run, policies > should be shipped in the individual packages. We'll create a set > of usertags to track AppArmor -related bugs, and we'll inform > maintainers that we're happy to help them fix it. This is part of > an OPW project that was just submitted, by the way: > > https://wiki.debian.org/OutreachProgramForWomen#AppArmor_profiles_for_widely_used_applications > Excellent to hear. I've signed up for the mailing list and will keep an eye out for where I can help. Thanks for the update! :) -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
