On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 04:58:08PM -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > > So, I've been going through the Ubuntu AppArmor bugs[1]. > > The good news is that I cleaned out some old bugs and mostly triaged the > rest. I > started adding a few tags here and there to try to make things easier for > people > who are focused on different bits: > * aa-policy[2]: anything to do with policy files > * aa-feature[3]: new feature work > * aa-tools[4]: anything with the aa-* tools > > Not everything has one of those tags (eg, the parser does not). If you feel > more > or different tags are warranted, let's coordinate here. I encourage people to > use these tags, but I'll also try to keep an eye out to make sure things are > tagged right. > > I adjusted a few priorities here and there, but didn't do too much in that > regard. Where I've added them or changed them should be considered up for > discussion still (ie, I added stuff based on current understanding, but I > could > be wrong :).
Thanks for going through the bugs, it's really appreciated. I'll try to make use of the tags. > Now, those are *Ubuntu* AppArmor bugs, so why am I sending here? Mostly so we > could talk about the tags. I didn't feel comfortable adjusting a bunch of bugs > in the APpArmor upstream project-- I can make a pass with the tags if people > want. I don't have a problem with adding tags to bugs in the apparmor project; for people who aren't interested in them, they are easily ignored. The only request I would make is to document the tags on wiki.apparmor.net, possibly on a separate page under http://wiki.apparmor.net/index.php/Documentation#Misc . Thanks again! -- Steve Beattie <[email protected]> http://NxNW.org/~steve/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
