Hello,

Am Samstag, 13. Juni 2015 schrieb John Johansen:
> On 06/12/2015 04:11 PM, John Johansen wrote:
> > On 06/12/2015 04:09 PM, Christian Boltz wrote:

> >> The more interesting question is: are all apparmor.d.pod changes in
> >> trunk also valid for 2.9? If yes, we should backport _all_
> >> apparmor.d.pod changes to 2.9 ;-)

> So it looks like the only changes that aren't good are the ones around
> change_profile [ onexec ] [ '->' profile ]

Indeed, that's also what I remembered after sending the mail.

> because the onexec stuff isn't in 2.9, and I am hesitant to backport
> it.
> 
> Can I get an ack on committing the other apparmor.d.pod changes to 2.9

Sounds like a good idea, so
Pre-Acked-by: Christian Boltz <[email protected]>

I'll check the diff to trunk after you commited your backport to 2.9.


Regards,

Christian Boltz
-- 
"Alarm" heisst "al armas", also "Zu den Waffen!". Womit soll
ich in meinen Rechner reinballern,  wenn er Hitzealarm gibt?
[Ratti in suse-linux]


-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to