On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 03:17:19PM -0600, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > > 2. stack_onexec, stack delayed until exec applied pre-exec transitions
> > >   A -- stack_onexec B -- exec apply stack -- A//&B -- exec trans --> C//&D

> Do you feel like #2 is still useful? I don't want to put words in John's
> mouth (so correct me if I'm wrong, John) but I feel like he and I were
> focusing on #1 and #3.

No, I don't think #2 is worth keeping. It feels too confusing. If the
program author wants this behaviour, aa_stack_profile() would allow the
B -> D transition at exec time, though the intermediate behaviour would
be different.

Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to