On 2016-01-26 20:15:47, Steve Beattie wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 07:47:53PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 06:58:24PM -0600, Tyler Hicks wrote: > > > I'll need to think about this a bit more before I can propose a better > > > solution. > > > > While you're working on this block it'd be nice to replace "make" with > > $(MAKE) -- that lets the -j job scheduler work in the recursive makes, > > along with the -t -n -q options. > > > > I opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1536548 for this > > recently, but it's not a large enough priority to fix on its own. But if > > you're there already... :) > > While I agree that we should use $(MAKE), making snapshot tarballs > can not really be parallelized.
Agreed. However, the cov-build portion of the proposed `make coverity` target could be parallelized. We'll want to do this soonish. Tyler > > -- > Steve Beattie > <[email protected]> > http://NxNW.org/~steve/ > -- > AppArmor mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
