On 2016-04-14 14:03:27, Simon Déziel wrote: > On 2016-04-13 05:50 PM, Seth Arnold wrote: > > It feels like the accessibility dbus rules may be better suited in an > > #include. > > Or maybe abstractions/dbus-accessibility-strict is just too strict?
dbus-accessibility-strict is for talking to dbus-daemon itself on the accessibility bus. dbus-accessibility is for doing any action on the accessibility bus. Note that the rules you have are for talking to a service on the session bus. I'm thinking that there should be an "accessibility-services" (or maybe just "accessibility") abstraction which has the a11y rules and also includes dbus-accessibility-strict? -- https://code.launchpad.net/~sdeziel/apparmor/wireshark-refresh/+merge/291820 Your team AppArmor Developers is requested to review the proposed merge of lp:~sdeziel/apparmor/wireshark-refresh into lp:apparmor. -- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
