On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:52:44PM -0700, John Johansen wrote:
> When set atomic replacement is used and the parent is updated before the
> child, and the child did not exist in the old parent so there is no
> direct replacement then the new child is incorrectly added to the old
> parent. This results in the new parent not having the child(ren) that
> it should and the old parent when being destroyed asserting the
> following error.
> 
> AppArmor: policy_destroy: internal error, policy '<profile/name>' still 
> contains profiles
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Johansen <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Seth Arnold <[email protected]>

Thanks

> ---
>  security/apparmor/policy.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/policy.c b/security/apparmor/policy.c
> index 222052f..c92a9f6 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/policy.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/policy.c
> @@ -1193,7 +1193,7 @@ ssize_t aa_replace_profiles(void *udata, size_t size, 
> bool noreplace)
>                       /* aafs interface uses replacedby */
>                       rcu_assign_pointer(ent->new->replacedby->profile,
>                                          aa_get_profile(ent->new));
> -                     __list_add_profile(&parent->base.profiles, ent->new);
> +                     __list_add_profile(&newest->base.profiles, ent->new);
>                       aa_put_profile(newest);
>               } else {
>                       /* aafs interface uses replacedby */

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to