On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 12:18:00PM +0200, Christian Boltz wrote:
> > > .. though I'm worried that this kind of patch may break something
> > > subtle. So I'd like to make sure that you've tried compile and
> > > tests with this patch first? Sure, it _looks_ right, but flex is a
> > > funny creature.
> 
> Do you seriously expect that I send a patch for code I don't understand 
> without running the testsuite? ;-)

For all avoidance of doubt, no, I know you're good about running the
tests.

But introducing a change to the language parsers that may cause e.g.
shift-reduce warnings may lead to non-obvious trouble long after this
dot is forgotten. So I wanted to double-check this one. :)

> > its good
> > 
> > Acked-by: John Johansen <[email protected]>
> 
> Wow, two acks for adding one dot!
> 
> Any chance I can at least get one for my other pending patches? ;-)
> (I'm talking about the DBUS series and the test to check for hotkey 
> conflicts in all languages.)

Good idea. I liked the part of the hotkey patch that I read before..

Thanks

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to