On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:31:18PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote: > I vote for keeping techdoc and creating the PDF at tarball creation, so > > apparmor-build_docs_w_tarball.patch > Acked-by: Christian Boltz <appar...@cboltz.de> > > I didn't test your patch, so please create a test tarball to make sure > the PDF really gets packaged (and isn't the victim of some "make clean" > that might be part of the tarball build process ;-)
Yep, I verified that. There is a 'clean' stage of the tarball build process, but it's on the working tree, and honestly, it's a bit superfluous, because the tarball/snapshot build process goes out of its way to avoid capturing local changes by checking out a clean copy of the branch and using that as the basis for the tarball. Thanks. -- Steve Beattie <sbeat...@ubuntu.com> http://NxNW.org/~steve/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- AppArmor mailing list AppArmor@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
