Hi Goldwyn, Am Freitag, 13. Januar 2017, 13:22:02 CET schrieb Goldwyn Rodrigues: > On 01/13/2017 12:25 PM, Christian Boltz wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2016, 21:33:17 CET schrieb Goldwyn Rodrigues: > >> Thanks, Thats a lot of information. I will work on this and let you > >> know as the work progresses. > > > > Half a year later - any progress? > > I've had other pressing matters. In any case. I worked a bit on the > patch to make it more suitable for processing. I basically stripped it > off the new lines so that there is one record per line.
Sounds like the difference between "human readable" and "machine readable" ;-) - and for obvious reasons, machine readable is more important here since aa-logprof already has a human-readable interface without json. > I can send the patch if you wish. Whenever you think it's useful enough and/or want someone to review it ;-) > > Someone at SUSE recommended that I should announce that the perl > > modules will finally be dropped in the next release to force > > progress in YaST. If you need this to get a time budget for working > > on this, tell me and I'll happily send that announcement to the > > YaST mailinglist ;-) > > > > Even without such an announcement, I can tell you that none of the > > upstream developers will touch the perl modules, so you'll at least > > have to implement dconf rule support yourself. > > Dropping the modules may help. Tell me if you need such an announcement to convince your manager ;-) > However, since no one is touching it, > it rather might be there. The "no one is touching it" is exactly the problem - when dconf rules get added and one of the profiles contains such a rule, the perl code will explode and tell you about an invalid rule. (This is why I wrote that you'll at least have to add support for dconf rules to the perl code.) And the "it's still there" is why nobody focussed on rewriting the YaST module ;-)) > In the meantime, I should get some time to > ramp up with ruby and initiate the port. > > As for the time, I hope to do this during Hackweek, which should be > mid-feb, so a timeframe of May/June 2017 should be good. What do you > say? Sounds good :-) IIRC most people do reports or even a short video about their hackweek project, so please keep us updated ;-) Regards, Christian Boltz -- Life used to be simpler when apple and blackberry were just fruits! [from https://bugzilla.novell.com/quips.cgi]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
