On May 23, 2018 3:27 AM, Noah Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > Whoops, I accidentally sent an older 32x32 version. I've attached the > > 64x64 version with some slight adjustments to the size of the 'A's, > > inner shield and height of the shadow on the leg of the white 'A'. > > This kind of logo isn't really suitable for icon resolutions smaller > > than 32x32, so I could make an alternative logo specifically for 22x22 > > and 16x16. > > On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 7:41 PM, John Johansen > > [email protected] wrote: > > > On 05/22/2018 12:21 AM, Noah Davis wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm working on icons for openSUSE's YaST Control Center and I realized > > > > > > AppArmor needed a unique and attractive way to identify it. I have > > > > > > attached the logo I came up with. Constructive feedback is > > > > > > appreciated. > > > > Hi Noah, > > > > nice, thanks > > > > so I do have a few comments > > > > - at smaller sizes it gets difficult to identify the 'A's > > > > I messed around in gimp a little and here are some suggestions based on > > things I tried, feel free to ignore > > > > - darkening the colour does increase the contrast and helps with the > > white A but doesn't help the coloured A, I think because it has less > > contrast to the shadow > > - extending the none shared legs a little (they can extend into the > > border) does help with being able recognize the 'A's when the logo is small > > - providing a dark outline (I used the outline color) does help with the > > 'A's visibility > > > > of course I understand some of these may affect the logo in adverse ways > > when you are looking at a larger version. > > > > the other question would be around licensing, if you want it to be used in > > the upstream project (and not just yast) the license will need to be > > compatible, and open to sharing.
What about using 'red' instead of 'cyan' ? ​Jordan -- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
