On Thu, 2018-05-24 at 07:57 -0700, John Johansen wrote: > > What about a new keyword in the place of allow/deny so that > we could specify that the rule is not specifying an allow or > a deny but is to be applied to all access attempts that it > overlaps > > audit access w /foo/bar/**, > quiet access w /foo/bar/**, > > this would allow audit to continue to be used as a modifier, > and also then allow quiet to be used as a modifier for the > sake of symmetry of the language. > I like this.
-- Jamie Strandboge | http://www.canonical.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- AppArmor mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor
