Oh alright I understand, thank you Casey.

________________________________
From: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
Sent: 26 July 2019 21:59
To: Abhishek Vijeev <[email protected]>; [email protected] 
<[email protected]>
Cc: Rakesh Rajan Beck <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [apparmor] Questions about AppArmor's Kernel Code

On 7/26/2019 5:56 AM, Abhishek Vijeev wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I have a few questions about AppArmor's kernel code and would be grateful if 
> you could kindly answer them.?
>
>
> 1) Why does AppArmor maintain two separate security blobs in cred->security 
> as well as task-security for processes? For a simple project that requires 
> associating a security context with every task, would it suffice to use just 
> one of these?
>
>
> 2) There has been a change in the way security blobs are accessed from kernel 
> version 4.18 to 5.2. I see that in v5.2, the?security blob's address is 
> obtained by adding the size of the blob to the start address. Why has this 
> change been made? (For 
> reference:?https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/security/apparmor/include/cred.h#L24)
>
The change was made to allow multiple security modules to share the
blobs. The security module initialization replaces the size of the blobs
in apparmor_bob_sizes with their offsets in the blob. The addition you
see adds the offset, not the size.

>
> 3) I tried adding a custom field (pointer to a custom structure) to struct 
> aa_profile, at exactly this point 
> -?https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/security/apparmor/include/policy.h#L144.
>  I have taken care to allocate and free memory for the pointer at the 
> appropriate places (allocation is performed here 
> -?https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/security/apparmor/policy_unpack.c#L671?and
>  freeing is performed?here 
> -?https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/security/apparmor/policy.c#L205).?However,
>  while booting the kernel, it crashes?at the function 
> 'security_prepare_creds( )', which I presume invokes 'apparmor_cred_prepare( 
> )'. If I was, to assume for a moment that there are no bugs with my memory 
> allocation code, is there any other reason why such a crash might have 
> occurred??I have attached the kernel crash log?file?with this email for your 
> kind?reference.?
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Abhishek.
>
>
>
>
-- 
AppArmor mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/apparmor

Reply via email to