Thank you all for participating in our Google Group.
The Appigo Team -- Appigo Support [email protected] Learn more about Todo (task management made simple), Notebook (notes available everywhere), and AccuFuel (fuel efficiency tracker) on Appigo's website: http://www.appigo.com/ Follow the latest from Appigo on Facebook: http://www.tinyurl.com/appigo-fb Follow the latest from Appigo on Twitter: http://twitter.com/appigo Participate with Appigo and our community using the following Google groups: http://groups.google.com/group/appigo-todo/ http://groups.google.com/group/appigo-notebook/ http://groups.google.com/group/appigo-accufuel/ On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:45 AM, mmorowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Makes complete sense. > > On Jan 22, 10:30 am, hockey_magnet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Michael, > > > > I agree, with the understanding that of the 4 criteria, the first 3 > > are relative absolutes and only priority is subjective so it's fairly > > critical, at least to me, in the process. If I'm at the office with 8 > > hours of open time available and lots of energy, I would usually have > > a high number of "available" tasks, so priority becomes critical to my > > selection process. > > > > Regards, > > > > Chris > > > > On Jan 22, 11:13 am, mmorowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Chris, > > > > > That certainly does make sense. Allen's "Four Criteria Model for > > > Choosing Actions in the Moment" goes like this: > > > 1. Context > > > 2. Time available > > > 3. Energy available > > > 4. Priority > > > > > If you've got a ton of tasks where the first 3 are relatively equal, > > > you can and should fall back on priority (before resorting to "gut > > > feeling"). But I do personally agree with it being the last thing on > > > this list. That's kinda why I don't spend too much time worrying > > > about it (even though most task management tools, including ToDo, put > > > it front and center). > > > > > Best, > > > Michael > > > > > On Jan 21, 2:10 pm, hockey_magnet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Absolutely - GTD is not meant to be 100% rigid, I think I interpreted > > > > DA's concept around next actions as being combined somehow with > > > > priorities . I also think it really makes a difference if you have a > > > > lot of single tasks or a lot of projects with a lot of tasks. In my > > > > case, if I have 10 projects that all have to get completed, it is > > > > usually easy to decide NA's. The problem becomes if all the NA's have > > > > the same or similar context and relative time limits, which one do I > > > > choose? That's why I use priorities so that I don't have to spend so > > > > much time re evaluating which NA to do next. Having said that > > > > priorities do change and the one thing I've learned from GTD is if > you > > > > do not do the Review consistently, the system inevitably just turns > > > > into a to do list and simply doesn't work properly. > > > > > > This is all just my opinion of course > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > On Jan 21, 9:18 am, mmorowitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks very much, hockey_magnet. I can certainly see your point > about > > > > > priorities. I'm going to go back and read what Allen says about > > > > > priorities, especially in the context of a Next Action list. > > > > > Personally, I have a very hard time making a mental decision about > > > > > priority when I'm processing a task. I generally just say, "I don't > > > > > know! I just need to do it!!" > > > > > > > When I read GTD, priorities and projects were the two chapters/ > > > > > concepts that I found least applicable to my personal style. My > mental > > > > > picture of my own tasks is a big bucket of stuff that all needs to > get > > > > > done: few goal-oriented projects and all tasks are important (with > a > > > > > few exceptions). In spite of that minor disconnect for me, GTD > really > > > > > works (now). I've found this to be the case with a lot of other > GTDers > > > > > that I've talked to: there are one or two elements of the overall > > > > > approach that aren't effective. For some people, it's contexts, for > > > > > others it's the tickler file. > > > > > > > This is one of the things that I like about GTD: it's a clearly- > > > > > defined approach with just enough flexibility to allow for personal > > > > > style. There are, of course, a few elements that I believe are > > > > > critical elements (inbox processing, calendar management, task > > > > > reviews). > > > > > > > jimmydolittle, I'm very glad you found it helpful. It makes the > time I > > > > > spent writing it up worthwhile to see that someone found it useful. > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > Michael > > -- > Learn more about Todo (task management made simple), Notebook (notes > available everywhere), and AccuFuel (fuel efficiency tracker) on Appigo's > website: http://www.appigo.com/ > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Appigo Todo" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/appigo-todo?hl=en > -- Learn more about Todo (task management made simple), Notebook (notes available everywhere), and AccuFuel (fuel efficiency tracker) on Appigo's website: http://www.appigo.com/ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Appigo Todo" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/appigo-todo?hl=en
