What are the government subsidies involved?

Art Kelly
Kelly Orchards
Acton, ME

2011/3/14 Jerome Frecon <[email protected]>

>  Bill:
>
>             It appears the author of the article in Slate is making  the
> claims about feeding and yields but the data he presents was the result of
> research done by an economist at the USDA.  The author lists the USDA web
> site where the 2008 study is described. I read it and I do not see all of
> the claims the author makes in the article on the USDA site. It thus appears
> he is documenting the results in his article by mentioning the USDA site and
> giving us the link.  Thus I do not see how he is not trying to be biased.
>    Many authors in non refereed publications or all forms of media put their
> own spin on things, I am not sure if that constitutes being biased?  Some of
> the authors claims seem plausible.
>
>             You mention many things in your response, some of which seem
> possible.   If you or Rodale could provide some documented or peer reviewed
> science to better explain these statements this would be an excellent
> rebuttal to the authors claims.
>
> For example your mention  “The average cost of 20 years of organic food
> production in Italy remains less than conventional fruits and vegetables
> with 55,000 certified growers who feed all the school systems”    Has
> there been a peer reviewed study done with documentation on this subject.  I
> am always hungry for good science based information on organic agriculture.
>
>
>
>
> I think statements in the article like the following hurt scientists trying
> to publish information about organic agriculture
>
> As Jason Clay, senior vice president of the World Wildlife Fund, 
> writes<http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/a-hybrid-path-to-feeding-9-billion-on-a-still-green-planet/>,
> "I think we need a new kind of agriculture—kind of a third agriculture,
> between the big agribusiness, commercial approach to agriculture, and the
> lessons from organic and local systems."   There are so many
> contradictions in this statement  Is he saying that we need agriculture that
> is not treated as an agribusiness or commercial?  In other words new
> agriculture is not supposed to generate revenue or be operated at a profit?
>   “And the lessons from organic and locals systems?”  Is he saying that all
> organic and local farmers are not commercial and are not agricultural
> businesses.  This is idiocy.  There is no one I hold in higher esteem than a
> local organic farmer who is commercial and is a viable agribusiness that
> generates significant revenue and yields, and make a acceptable profit.
>
>
>
>
>
> **
>
> *Jerome L. "Jerry" Frecon*
>
> Agricultural Agent I (Professor 1)
>
> Gloucester County Extension Department Head
>
> *Cooperative Extension, Gloucester County*
>
> 1200 North Delsea Drive, Clayton, N.J. 08312
>
> Phone 856 307-6450 Ext 1 Fax 856 307-6476
>
> http://gloucester.njaes.rutgers.edu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Bill Sciarappa
> *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2011 3:57 PM
> *To:* 'Dave Schmitt'; 'Apple-crop discussion list';
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [apple-crop] Can Organic Agriculture Feed the World?
>
>
>
> Thanks for the article Dave.
>
> The main fallacy in it's undocumented and biased assertion (same as
> Rodale's political advocacy approach) is  extrapolating apples to oranges.
> Comparing US certified production to anything gives a false impression. Our
> American organic effort lags  far behind Australia, China, South America and
> most parts of Europe.  Some certification in these countries is more
> stringent than US and some is not certified at all yet better in quality
> than US. Incorporating global organic uncertified would paint a very
> different and more equitable picture.
>
>
>
> Regardless, if unlimited human population growth occurs, there will be even
> more food scarcity  and food riots but largely because of a distribution
> chain problem in less accessible places and human populations that cannot
> economically afford to pay. The average cost of 20 years of organic food
> production in Italy remains less than conventional fruits and vegetables
> with 55,000 certified growers who feed all the school systems. That's
> existing real world evidence that is gaining in European ag every year. USA
> policy and economic development funding has done all it can to retard such
> sustainable  growth.
>
>
>
> Bill Sciarappa
>
>
>
> *From:* Dave Schmitt [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Friday, March 11, 2011 2:54 PM
> *To:* Apple-crop discussion list; [email protected];
> [email protected]
> *Subject:* Can Organic Agriculture Feed the World?
>
>
>
> Interesting piece in Slate:
>
> http://www.slate.com/id/2287746/
>
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> apple-crop mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop
>
>
_______________________________________________
apple-crop mailing list
[email protected]
http://virtualorchard.net/mailman/listinfo/apple-crop

Reply via email to