On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 02:37:40AM +0100, Antonio Rodr�guez wrote: > I think the problem is the software more than the hardware.
I will disagree here, and suggest that the hardware will be harder. The basic problem you are dealing with: there aren't any inexpensive ways to connect multiple Apple II computers. But it should be pretty easy to design this hardware (just TTL gates, I would think). The software isn't complex if you are in a master/slave situation. You do not need multitasking. You do not need special compilers. All you need to do is implement a carefully designed state machine. Of course it will be more trouble writing software than it is worth. Then again, if that is the case, we wouldn't be talking about Apple II's. Anyhow, the best of luck with your parallel // computing project. Get it? Parallel //? Oh well. Byron. -- Apple2list is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and... / Buy books, CDs, videos, and more from Amazon.com \ / <http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/lowendmac> \ Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Apple2list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/apple2.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/apple2list%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
