Hi, "Frank Buss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Justin Heyes-Jones wrote: > >> The advantages are the obvious reliablity (both uptime and speed) of >> google infrastructure. (I've noticed a lot of downtime and slowness on >> sourceforge.) The bug (or issue) tracking is very simple, very >> visible, and easy to use. > > Sourceforge has sometimes problems, but most of the time it works. But I > don't care, where the repository is, and you may be right that Google is > more reliable. > What about http://common-lisp.net/ the defacto place where common lisp projects are hosted. They have SVN, and Trac, which IMO is much better than sourceforge for bugs and issue tracking and as a bonus has a wiki also. My 2 cents. Regards, -- Surendra Singhi http://ssinghi.kreeti.com, http://www.kreeti.com Read my blog at: http://cuttingtheredtape.blogspot.com/ ,---- | Great wits are sure to madness near allied, | And thin partitions do their bounds divide. | | (John Dryden, Absalom and Achitophel, 1681) `---- _______________________________________________ application-builder mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder
