At Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:35:41 +0300, Samium Gromoff wrote: > > At Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:49:34 -0800, > Luke J Crook wrote: > > Samium Gromoff wrote: > > > The rectangle generic could produce the rectangle of the surface. > > > > > > The example above is really dubious, it should have been something like > > > > > > (sdl:draw-box (sdl:rectangle surface) :surface surface) > > > > That sounds reasonable. Trouble is that sdl:rectangle creates a new > > rectangle. > > Oh, i missed that.. > > > How about: > > > > GET-CLIP-RECT - We already have this one defined. It gets the clip > > rectangle for the surface. > > GET-SURF-RECT - Get the rectangle that describes the surface > > GET-CELL-RECT - Get the rectangle used for drawing the current cell in a > > sprite sheet. > > hmm, probably dropping the get- prefix might make it less redundant?
oh, and in this case, i suppose, they can be accompanied by setf methods, as well.. > otherwise than that, it's perfectly fine by me. > > > - Luke > > regards, Samium Gromoff _______________________________________________ application-builder mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder
