Yes that sounds better. Justin
On 3/5/07, Luke J Crook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Heyes-Jones wrote: > > I'm not sure what we gain by that, it seems keeping them in different > > packages means it's easier to load only the ones you want? Not to > > mention that you have to track down the DLL's for libraries that you > > might not use. > > > > Or would the move be transparent unless you did load them? > > Yes, each package should still be loaded separately. But now I think > that leaving each package as-is and uploading one large zip containing > all the lispbuilder-sdl-* source packages to Sourceforge makes more > sense. All the Win32 binaries could also be available as separate > packages in a single download. > > > - Luke > _______________________________________________ > application-builder mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder > _______________________________________________ application-builder mailing list [email protected] http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder
