Frank Buss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe we should implement
> with-poll-events and with-wait-events (idea for implementing: a genereal
> with-events-impl macro, with a parameter for poll and wait, with which both
> macros can be defined).
* WITH-EVENTS now accepts an optional TYPE parameter. (SDL:WITH-EVENTS
(:POLL) &body body)
- TYPE may be :POLL or :WAIT.
- :POLL uses SDL_PollEvent to process events
- :WAIT uses SDL_WaitEvent to process events.
Note that when :WAIT is used, (:IDLE ()) is ignored.
* Modified sdl-examples:random-box-1 and sdl-examples:random-box-2 to show the
use of :POLL and :WAIT
- Luke
_______________________________________________
application-builder mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder