Frank Buss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Maybe we should implement
> with-poll-events and with-wait-events (idea for implementing: a genereal
> with-events-impl macro, with a parameter for poll and wait, with which both
> macros can be defined).


* WITH-EVENTS now accepts an optional TYPE parameter. (SDL:WITH-EVENTS 
(:POLL) &body body)
  - TYPE may be :POLL or :WAIT.
    - :POLL uses SDL_PollEvent to process events
    - :WAIT uses SDL_WaitEvent to process events. 
      Note that when :WAIT is used, (:IDLE ()) is ignored.

* Modified sdl-examples:random-box-1 and sdl-examples:random-box-2 to show the 
use of :POLL and :WAIT


- Luke

_______________________________________________
application-builder mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder

Reply via email to