Michael Compton <michael.comp...@littleedge.co.uk> writes: >> Michael Compton <michael.comp...@littleedge.co.uk> writes: >> >> > Thanks for the reply Justin. >> > >> > I realise now after doing some research last night that CFFI really only >> > provides FFI for C, and that wrapping would be required. I may look into >> > this myself at some point, but fortunately I wont have any free time >> > until near the end of the year. >> > >> > Was any similar alternative library identified that might offer the same >> > capabilities and provide a more accessible interface for Lisp? >> > >> > Michael >> > >> > >> On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 23:01 +0100, Kristoffer Ström wrote: >> >> There's a great little c lib called chipmunk: >> http://code.google.com/p/chipmunk-physics/ >> >> i started to make cffi bindings for it, but I don't relly have the >> knowledge required to do it "right" >> >> but yes i agree, it would be really nice to have. >> _______________________________________________ > I hadn't realised chipmunk was in C, I only briefly looked around and > got the feeling most were in C++, if it is already in C that would be > convenient as no wrapping would be required. > > I have very little knowledge of CFFI or chipmunk for that matter, but I > would be interested in looking at this sometime in the future. I have > very little free time at the moment but near the end of the year I might > have a look again, after mid December when the semester ends. > > Kristoffer: Did you get anything working with CFFI and chipmunk?
Not really anything other than initializing a few collision shapes without running any simulations on them, but i might play with it some more in the coming weeks. I'll let you know if anything usable falls out. _______________________________________________ application-builder mailing list application-builder@lispniks.com http://www.lispniks.com/mailman/listinfo/application-builder
