[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
joes 2003/11/10 17:11:01
Modified: . STATUS
build version_check.pl
Log:
Prep for final release of 2.01_03-dev
Revision Changes Path
1.34 +2 -2 httpd-apreq-2/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-apreq-2/STATUS,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -r1.33 -r1.34
--- STATUS 1 Nov 2003 19:17:29 -0000 1.33
+++ STATUS 11 Nov 2003 01:11:01 -0000 1.34
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Last modified at [$Date$] -*-text-*-
/** @page STATUS
- 2.01-dev in development
+ 2.01-dev tagged and rolled for release on November 10, 2003
Contributors looking for a mission:
1.9 +1 -1 httpd-apreq-2/build/version_check.pl
Index: version_check.pl
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/httpd-apreq-2/build/version_check.pl,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.8 -r1.9
--- version_check.pl 8 Nov 2003 00:32:21 -0000 1.8
+++ version_check.pl 11 Nov 2003 01:11:01 -0000 1.9
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
my %perl_glue = (
perl => $build{perl},
"Apache::Test" => { version => "1.04", test => \&a_t_version,
- comment => "bundled with mod_perl 1.99_09" },
+ comment => "Win32 requires version 1.06" },
but it still checks for 1.04. Would it better to do?
my $apache_test_version = $^O eq 'MSWin32' ? "1.06" : "1.04";
...
"Apache::Test" => { version => $apache_test_version,
__________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman JAm_pH ------> Just Another mod_perl Hacker
http://stason.org/ mod_perl Guide ---> http://perl.apache.org
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://use.perl.org http://apacheweek.com
http://modperlbook.org http://apache.org http://ticketmaster.com
