I'm in the progress of updating it all (except gcc version 3.2.3, is
that bad?)
On my dev box I've been using Apache/2.0.55, should I upgrade to 2.2 or
is that
too new? It seems that the 2.0 is as 58 should I update both my
development
and my production to that? I know you know best.
How did you get past the version check of this ?
Until last night my production server was managed by my host.
So I'm not sure how they installed anything. While I was installing
libapreq cpan failed so I tried it at the command line, and still
got the errors, so I'm not sure I could get passed the version check.
As I was updating my perl modules via cpan I noticed a lot of
test failures. Not that I've installed perl v5.8.8 they're gone.
Thanks for the help,
Boysenberry
boysenberrys.com | habitatlife.com | selfgnosis.com
On Jul 8, 2006, at 3:35 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Boysenberry Payne wrote:
I'm trying to build libapreq2-2.07 on Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-42,
Apache/2.0.46, perl v5.8.0 built for i386-linux-thread-multi,
2.0.48 is a minium version. Please read the CHANGES file. I strongly
suggest upgrading
_ALL_ that software its ancient.
How did you get past the version check of this ?
Also, if you are using gcc 4.x you'll need to add -fno-strict-aliases
which will be in 2.08 and I'm rolling 2.08-RC3 right this second.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Philip M. Gollucci ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 323.219.4708
Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.shtml
Senior Software Engineer - TicketMaster - http://ticketmaster.com
1024D/A79997FA F357 0FDD 2301 6296 690F 6A47 D55A 7172 A799 97F
"In all that I've done wrong I know I must have done something right to
deserve a hug every morning and butterfly kisses at night."
