Randy Kobes wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006, Issac Goldstand wrote:

Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Issac Goldstand wrote:
Following up on the FAIL report for win32:

Which CGI tests fail ?

Erm, my win32 build computer fizzled a bit last night, but I'll try to
remember to post this on Sunday.  I've already seen the same tests
failing on a separate PC with a separate build environment (at work -
yesterday's build were on my home office PC); I saw it when I was
originally writing the interactive-cgi module (but never found time to
chase them down)


The new Apache-Test-1.29-RC2 runs the test suite for 2.08 just fine
(against mod_perl-2.0.3-RC2).  However, here the test suite can't load
mod_perl (also mod_perl-2.0.3-RC2) into the server properly:
The dection of mod_perl has changed 0 between 1.27->1.29 much less
1.29-rc1 and 1.29-rc2

CGI passes most tests (it fails 7; libapreq-2.08 also fails the same
ones lately.  That's a separate issue for a separate thread, though),
it's just the mod_perl ones that seem to fail.
Didn't you just contradict yourself ?  I'm probably reading that wrong


I don't think so - the CGI (t/apreq/cgi.t) test runs as a normal CGI, so
IIRC doesn't go through mod_perl...

That's true, but it needs mod_perl, for some APR::* modules.
Not quite; it needs the perl glue (eg, the XS extensions linked against APR/Apache)
It doesn't need Apache running mod_perl.so
Can you try installing the latest mod_perl-2.0.3-rc2 that
Philip posted to see if that helps?

That's what I was using.
Deeper probing (t/conf/httpd.conf) shows that:
<IfModule !mod_perl.c>
    #unable to locate mod_perl.so (could be a static build)
</IfModule>
Yes that would be the problem. (does Apache-Test have the correct path
to apxs and is it actually functional?)


I believe so; the same Apache-Test detects the same mod_perl just fine
on the 2.08 tarball - it's really quite odd...  Sunday I'll see if I can
reproduce this at work.

Does the installed Apache::TestConfigData point to the
correct httpd.exe?

Not sure - trying to replicate this at work now - we'll see what happens.

 Issac

Reply via email to