After reviewing the RELEASE files for 1.x and 2.x, I'd like to propose that we clean them up a bit (though I don't forsee any more 1.3 releases, we may as well get it in at the same time as 2.x)
I won't summarize the current orders of operation (see [1] and [2]), but here's what I'd like to see happen: 1) Create a release branch 1.x/2.x in /branches/ 2) In trunk, modify the CHANGES and STATUS files to reflect a new dev cycle 3) From the branch, prep the release for CPAN (don't forget to #undef the APREQ_VERSION_IS_DEV macro definition). Test. Upload. Vote. Repeat if needed. 4) AFTER the release is approved by the PMC, modify the RELEASE and STATUS files on branch + commit. Modify in trunk + commit. 5) Tag release from branch (svn mv .../branches/xxx .../tags/xxx) 6) Upload (release) Let me know what you think: [ ] Leave everything alone [ ] Change 1.x RELEASE file [ ] Change 2.x RELEASE file (if you agree to changing both, please +1 both of the bottom two options) Issac [1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/apreq/trunk/build/RELEASE [2] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/apreq/branches/1.x/RELEASE
