--- On Tue, 12/16/08, Michael Koziarski <mich...@koziarski.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Joe Schaefer
> <joe_schae...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > The "leak" of a bucket brigade into the pool
> shouldn't be
> > noticable.  The problem with all previous releases is
> that
> > apreq_brigade_fwrite would leak badly when dealing
> with
> > spool buckets- the current RC/trunk should fix that
> problem.
> 
> yeah, we definitely noticed the leak in in 2.08.  With
> 2.10RC we're
> still seeing a very very minor increase in the memory usage
> of our
> apache works, but it could well just be white noise that
> we're
> noticing because of that leak reference in the docs.
> 
> So am I correct in understanding that that bucket is only
> 'leaked' in
> the sense that it's no longer needed, it's still
> cleaned up when the
> pool cleans up?

That is correct.



      

Reply via email to