I didn't vote because AFAIK I don't actually have a vote. I have commit access, but I'm not a PMC member and therefore have no vote. Is that correct?
-----Original Message----- From: Issac Goldstand [mailto:mar...@beamartyr.net] Sent: 07 January 2009 13:24 Cc: APREQ List Subject: Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq 1.34-RC4 *ping* I don't actually see a vote from Steeve - just an advisory that it seems OK. I did vote +1, and am ready to roll (after having a baby boy + getting the flu twice; it's been a busy month ;)) as soon as I see a 3rd binding vote. Since steevehay does seem positive, I'm going to start tagging and rolling, but won't upload or announce until I formally close the vote Issac Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: >> Issac Goldstand wrote: >>> http://people.apache.org/~issac/libapreq-1.34-RC4.tar.gz >> Unit tests blow up spectacularly on solaris 2.10 but I don't think we >> support that and is related to Request.so failing to load. >> >> It does compile. >> >> I'll get a freebsd test for some sanity in the nearish future here. >> >> I wouldn't worry about the solaris blow ups (1.33 doesn't work either) >> >> > Nothing liked getting pissed off to get things to work. > (I believe the only difference I did was -httpd vs -apxs) > > All tests successful. > Files=4, Tests=25, 3 wallclock secs ( 1.22 cusr + 0.17 csys = 1.39 > CPU) > > Solaris 2.10 > apache 1.3.41 > mod_perl 1.30 > perl 5.8.8 > > so thats a +1 > > Neither of Steve's changes are to apreq itself so they don't block the > release. > > +1: stevenhay, pgollucci > +0: > -0: > -1: > > ISSAC did you vote ? if you do we get the required votes. > > If do the release, make sure you send the e-mails from an @apache.org > e-mail. >
