On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 06:32 -0800, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Are you planning to pursue 2.10 as RM or > should we be moving on to 2.11? The only outstanding issue I am aware > of is pgollucci's claim that the perl modules aren't linking correctly > to libapreq2 on Solaris. While that would be nice to fix, I don't consider > it a showstopper either.
I'm kinda waiting for the outcome of that discussion on the list before we go ahead. From what I can see, current decision is to have 2.11 released, right? If so, let's roll that (I'm not attached to version numbers in any way). -- Bojan
