On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Daniel Burrows <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Burrows <[email protected]> wrote:
> >  Basically, it sounds like they just want to have some record of what
> > you've done, but it's not clear that anyone looks at it.  I'm tempted
> > to say that you should just send them a bare git repository >=).  I
> > think a file per patch that you've committed would be fine too, and
> > that would make it clear what your work was (vs mine).
>
>  Just to be clear, the bare git repository thing was a joke.  I think
> a patch per commit is probably the best option (hopefully not too hard
> to generate with a little pipelining of git commands).

FWIW, this is what I did back in 2008.

Cheers

Arthur

_______________________________________________
Aptitude-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel

Reply via email to