Quoting Daniel Hartwig ([email protected]): > On 2 January 2012 06:52, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > These are some of the bugs that I've been loking at lately, but not closed, > > although I don't know if they are useful in their current state. Would you > > please take a look and give your opinion? > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=401974 > > Did you CC the submitter with your response to that one? By default > submitters do not receive messages sent to [email protected] [1].
By experience in triaging bugs, there are about zero chances that you get a useful answer for such bugs where the original useful information should have been sent immediately when the bug was reported. So, well, the only useful action is probably closing the bug with a nce message explaining that we are sorry for not reacting when the bug was reported and suggesting to reopen the bug if the bug submitter still experiences the issue. You get the point, I think...:) I closed a few dozens of bugs in samba, this way (most of them were indeed quite obviously user configuration errors, though, which might be less common for aptitude).
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
