On Monday 02 Jan 2012 10:12:14 Daniel Hartwig wrote: > On 2 January 2012 16:26, Christian PERRIER <[email protected]> wrote: > >> But I think that you missed all of the l10n-related ones of the second > >> link: > >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=aptitude#_0_6_2 > > > > I don't understand what you mean here. Do you have examples of bugs > > could have dealt with and which I didn't? > > I think he has not checked the updated changelog and sees the items > still marked `outstanding' on the BTS. > > I have added pending tags to the other bugs mentioned in your > changelog entry to remove the confusion.
Ummmm yes, that was it, sorry for the confusion :o) -- Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
