Quoting Axel Beckert ([email protected]): > > and adding myself to the control file to be able to upload releases > > in the future > > Yeah, lintian would argue if you're name stands at the end of the > changelog entry and you're not in the uploaders (or maintainers) > field.
Unless you mention "Team upload" in the changelog, to be pedantic...assuming that "[email protected]" is listed in "Maintainer:" > > Speaking of which, any idea about when should we make a release? > > Not me yet. :-) > > > I don't know if it should be after a while, to fix as many things as > > possible, or if it would be better soonish to acknowledge NMUs and > > release all of the fixes pending. > > It's probably not a bad idea to fix all the easier and less intrusive > stuff which is in now in before starting with the heavier stuff. > > Additionally you name would show up on > http://packages.qa.debian.org/a/aptitude.html and people (who don't > read Planet Debian ;-) would see that something's going, too. Exactly my point. I think that having a release of aptitude not too late (and thus give people a chance to test it as well as all autobuilders to build it) is the best to: - see if something unveiled yet makes aptitude RC-buggy - give the project a sign that aptitude development is resuming
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
