Hi,
Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo ([email protected]):
> I admit that I haven't followed recent discussions closely. I was only
> seeing quite a lot of traffic in the mailing list and I was naively
> thinking "hey they're doing great job" and I was thinking that
> everything was working well.
Same counts for me. Lots of bugs being tagged or closed.
> So, really, your mail takes me by surprise.
Dito.
> I went back quickly though the ML archive and found out that Daniel
> and you were discussing abou tyour proposed patches but...unless I
> overread thigns, I didn't find these discussion really being
> potentially demotivating ones.
Well, one thing he explicitly mentions is are the lintian warnings
which I brought up.
Nevertheless I still think nearly all of them were easy to fix and low
hanging fruits and Daniel Hartwig fixed them all in no time. So thanks
Daniel! So I still don't see the point why they shouldn't be fixed if
they were easy and quick to fix.
I don't think sponsoring requirements should be lowered at such
points, just because at _other_ points there's a lot of legacy in the
package, which I fully understand and respect.
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
_______________________________________________
Aptitude-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
