On Sb, 15 sep 12, 18:34:56, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > Thanks for the report. It does look like something is fishy. > > On 15 September 2012 18:09, Andrei POPESCU <[email protected]> wrote: > > $ aptitude search '?reverse-recommends(lxde)' | grep dm > > p gdm - GNOME Display Manager > > p gdm3 - Next generation GNOME Display Manager > > p kdm - KDE Display Manager for X11 > > i A lightdm - simple display manager > > p wdm - WINGs Display Manager - an xdm > > replacement > > p xdm - X display manager > > $ aptitude search '?reverse-depends(lxde)' | grep dm > > p gdm3 - Next generation GNOME Display Manager > > i A lightdm - simple display manager > > On my local sid system, without squeeze sources, the second list does > not include gdm3. > > > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, > > 'experimental') > > This looks interesting: > > squeeze: Recommends: gdm3 | x-display-manager > sid: Recommends: lightdm | x-display-manager
Yes, but neither explains why *dm's show up in the *depends* ;) Kind regards, Andrei P.S. Thank you for taking care of aptitude, life on sid would be so much harder without it :) -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
