Your message dated Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:11:49 +0800
with message-id
<can3veres3bj3t4klhjhvx2uxopj0wrzxafn4uta9vyufdj9...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#691874: aptitude: "versions" treats barewords as ?name
instead of ?exact-name
has caused the Debian Bug report #691874,
regarding aptitude: "versions" treats barewords as ?name instead of ?exact-name
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
691874: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691874
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.8.1-2
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
According to the documentation, the "versions" command treats each
argument as either a package name or a search pattern, depending on
whether or not it has any '~' or '?' characters.
This could, for example, be implemented by treating plain arguments as
"?exact-name" patterns.
However, it actually seems to treat them as "?name" patterns, so that
e.g. the wesnoth example produces this output:
,----
| $ aptitude versions --disable-columns wesnoth
| Package wesnoth:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-aoi:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-core:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-data:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-dbg:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-did:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-dm:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-dw:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-ei:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-httt:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-l:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-low:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-music:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-nr:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-server:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-sof:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-sotbe:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-thot:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-tools:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-trow:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-tsg:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-ttb:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.10-utbs:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-aoi:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-core:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-data:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-dbg:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-did:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-dm:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-dw:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-ei:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-httt:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-l:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-low:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-music:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-nr:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-server:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-sof:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-sotbe:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-thot:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-tools:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-trow:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-tsg:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-ttb:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-1.11-utbs:
| p 1:1.11.0-1 unstable 500
|
| Package wesnoth-core:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
|
| Package wesnoth-music:
| p 1:1.10.3-2 testing,unstable 990
| p 1:1.10.4-1 experimental 1
`----
-- Package-specific info:
Terminal: eterm-color
$DISPLAY is set.
which aptitude: /usr/bin/aptitude
aptitude version information:
aptitude 0.6.8.1 compiled at Sep 25 2012 15:27:00
Compiler: g++ 4.7.1
Compiled against:
apt version 4.12.0
NCurses version 5.9
libsigc++ version: 2.2.10
Ept support enabled.
Gtk+ support disabled.
Qt support disabled.
Current library versions:
NCurses version: ncurses 5.9.20110404
cwidget version: 0.5.16
Apt version: 4.12.0
aptitude linkage:
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xb770d000)
libapt-pkg.so.4.12 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libapt-pkg.so.4.12
(0xb7194000)
libncursesw.so.5 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libncursesw.so.5 (0xb7161000)
libtinfo.so.5 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libtinfo.so.5 (0xb7141000)
libsigc-2.0.so.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libsigc-2.0.so.0
(0xb713c000)
libcwidget.so.3 => /usr/lib/libcwidget.so.3 (0xb703c000)
libept.so.1.aptpkg4.12 => /usr/lib/libept.so.1.aptpkg4.12 (0xb6fa8000)
libxapian.so.22 => /usr/lib/libxapian.so.22 (0xb6dbf000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libz.so.1 (0xb6da6000)
libsqlite3.so.0 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libsqlite3.so.0 (0xb6cf5000)
libboost_iostreams.so.1.49.0 => /usr/lib/libboost_iostreams.so.1.49.0
(0xb6cdd000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
(0xb6cc3000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 (0xb6bd7000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libm.so.6 (0xb6bb1000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb6b94000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libc.so.6 (0xb6a37000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libutil.so.1 (0xb6a32000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/libdl.so.2 (0xb6a2e000)
libbz2.so.1.0 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libbz2.so.1.0 (0xb6a1d000)
libuuid.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1 (0xb6a17000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/i386-linux-gnu/i686/cmov/librt.so.1 (0xb6a0e000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb770e000)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii aptitude-common 0.6.8.1-2
ii libapt-pkg4.12 0.9.7.5
ii libboost-iostreams1.49.0 1.49.0-3.1
ii libc6 2.13-35
ii libcwidget3 0.5.16-3.4
ii libept1.4.12 1.0.9
ii libgcc1 1:4.7.1-7
ii libncursesw5 5.9-10
ii libsigc++-2.0-0c2a 2.2.10-0.2
ii libsqlite3-0 3.7.13-1
ii libstdc++6 4.7.1-7
ii libtinfo5 5.9-10
ii libxapian22 1.2.12-1
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.7.dfsg-13
Versions of packages aptitude recommends:
ii apt-xapian-index 0.45
ii aptitude-doc-en [aptitude-doc] 0.6.8.1-2
ii libparse-debianchangelog-perl 1.2.0-1
ii sensible-utils 0.0.7
Versions of packages aptitude suggests:
ii debtags 1.10.1
ii tasksel 3.13
-- no debconf information
--
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.6.9-1
On 31 October 2012 00:21, Samuel Bronson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: aptitude
> Version: 0.6.8.1-2
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> According to the documentation, the "versions" command treats each
> argument as either a package name or a search pattern, depending on
> whether or not it has any '~' or '?' characters.
>
> This could, for example, be implemented by treating plain arguments as
> "?exact-name" patterns.
>
> However, it actually seems to treat them as "?name" patterns, so that
> e.g. the wesnoth example produces this output:
This is resolved with the version in experimental.
Thanks for the report.
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Aptitude-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
