Hi, I marked the fuse-utils as auto before doing the second upgrade. I am 90% confident that aptitude safe-upgrade then produced: Will install 0 packages, and remove 0 packages. =============================================================================== [HOLD, DEPENDENCIES] fuse-utils:i386 [HOLD, DEPENDENCIES] fuseiso:i386 ===============================================================================
aptitude dist-upgrade did the job: Will install 1 packages, and remove 1 packages. 84.0 kB of disk space will be freed =============================================================================== [REMOVE, NOT USED] fuse-utils:i386 [UPGRADE] fuseiso:i386 20070708-2 -> 20070708-3 =============================================================================== Cheers, Grzegorz PS. I get this kind of situation quite often with packages not upgrading without any obvious reason. On 9 January 2013 11:48, Axel Beckert <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Grzegorz Andruszkiewicz wrote: >> I just ran the standard aptitude safe-upgrade today: >> grzes:/home/ga# aptitude safe-upgrade >> The following packages will be upgraded: >> inkscape librpm3 librpmbuild3 librpmio3 librpmsign1 python-xdg rpm >> rpm-common >> rpm2cpio >> 9 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 2 not upgraded. > [...] >> Current status: 2 updates [-9]. >> >> >> As you can see, there are still 2 updates left. So I tried: >> grzes:/home/ga# aptitude dist-upgrade >> The following packages will be upgraded: >> fuse-utils fuseiso >> 2 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. >> Need to get 66.3 kB of archives. After unpacking 13.3 kB will be freed. >> Do you want to continue? [Y/n/?] >> >> and as you see there are no issues why these should not be upgraded in the >> "safe" way. > > Indeed. Do you know the version of fuse-utils before the dist-upgrade? > For me, the upgrade was: > > 03-Jan-2013: > [UPGRADE] fuse-utils:amd64 2.9.0-2 -> 2.9.0-2+deb7u1 > > 06-Jan-2013: > [UPGRADE] fuseiso:amd64 20070708-2 -> 20070708-3 > > And the changelog entry of fuseiso 20070708-3 contains: > > * Renamed dependency from fuse-utils to fuse (Closes: #689009) > > And now it looks like this for me: > > fuse-utils: > Installed: 2.9.0-2+deb7u1 > Candidate: 2.9.0-2+deb7u1 > Version table: > *** 2.9.0-2+deb7u1 0 > 900 http://ftp.ch.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages > 901 http://ftp.ch.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-proposed-updates/main > amd64 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > fuseiso: > Installed: 20070708-3 > Candidate: 20070708-3 > Version table: > *** 20070708-3 0 > 900 http://ftp.ch.debian.org/debian/ wheezy/main amd64 Packages > 800 http://ftp.ch.debian.org/debian/ sid/main amd64 Packages > 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status > > fuse-utils is a transitional package which does no more exist in Sid, > so I suspect that the dependencies playing here are not dead simple > and I'm not so surprised that this can cause such issues. Nevertheless > it should have been able to do it in one run. > > Regards, Axel > -- > ,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ > : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin > `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE > `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to [email protected]. _______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
