On 2014-02-05 00:56:26 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > On 4 February 2014 19:53, Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2014-02-04 10:49:53 +0800, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > >> Again, I am only addressing the proposed patch. There are better > >> options, such as adjusting the default value of > >> Aptitude::ProblemResolver::SolutionCost to account for the number of > >> removals vs installs, or similar, but people should use such settings > >> and provide feedback on the quality of the solutions and their order. > > > > It would be better if aptitude could tell the reasons that led to the > > proposed solution. > > Do you mean: > > --\ icedtea6-plugin depends upon openjdk-6-jre (= 6b18-1.8.13-0+squeeze2) > -> Remove icedtea6-plugin [6b18-1.8.13-0+squeeze2 (now, oldstable)] > --\ openjdk-6-jre depends upon libjpeg8 > -> Remove openjdk-6-jre [6b18-1.8.13-0+squeeze2 (now)] > > ?
Something like that. Perhaps that's what the -v --show-why options do. -- Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) _______________________________________________ Aptitude-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
