Your message dated Thu, 20 Feb 2014 20:37:02 +0000
with message-id
<capq4b8nrjrkuguh_wdxu07_o6rtbxeteo_h42ann+b_mn4s...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: aptitude: Provide way to manually run apt-listchanges for
pkg
has caused the Debian Bug report #285197,
regarding aptitude: Provide way to manually run apt-listchanges for pkg
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
285197: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=285197
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.2.15.8-1
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if Aptitude provided a way to manually run
apt-listchanges for a package, if it's installed. This could appear in
the Package menu, right below Changelog, and would behave the same way
-- by default, run download the version to be installed, and run
apt-listchanges on that package.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages aptitude depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3 0.5.27 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.2-2 GCC support library
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsigc++-1.2-5c102 1.2.5-1 Type-safe Signal Framework for C++
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.4-13 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
2014-02-20 20:24 GMT+00:00 Marc Sherman <[email protected]>:
> It's been a while... Your thought is the only reason that makes sense,
> though. I'm sorry I didn't provide a clearer rationale in the original bug.
OK, no worries, so I am closing the bug now.
Thanks for the original report and for the quick reply now, so many
years later :-)
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <[email protected]>
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
Aptitude-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aptitude-devel
